Just because I dont believe in Christianity does not mean that I was not raised in a church. In fact I spent my first eight years of school in a religious establishment. Yet because I don't agree with a religion (or religion in general) this prevents me from knowing the tenants of a religion? I think not. I am well aware that christians profess to be humble in nature and nonjudgemental. This is not reflected in Michas post.
So let me get this straight. You are basing your view about how a Christian should behave on an 8th grader's mentality? That sounds about right.
How can you assume that I am miserable based on a few paragraphs I wrote on the internet.
Anyone that would follow a story that intended to inspire people with a negative commentary on Christianity would appear to be miserable. This would include you.
I didnt assume that you were miserable based on your naive beliefs.
So far this is the only logical thing you have said.
Do you feel uneasy when someones view differs from your own???
Not at all...well except when they act like a pompous know it all jackass. Again this would be you.
Maybe I see and hear from Christians quite often and I have made a habit of letting my beliefs be known on the matter. The internet does happen to be a bastion of free thought and expression.
This is true and that is why I am telling you what I think of your attack. And yes it was an attack. You claimed to have put forth some sort of argument, but this is what you said,
<begin christian rant<
LOL
So i prayed to Jah for like a month before I played in the S FL foosball championship. He bestowed me with some serious chronic which allowed me to decimate my opponents on my way to winning my division and finishing 5th in open doubles. On the way home I got superstoned in order to pay homage to he who giveth us heathens the dank weed.
BTW if there was a Christian God, as opposed to Buddah Alla Shiva Ganesh Zeus Thor or the Space Pope (who happens to be reptillian)etc. Please tell him I think he is an asshole and I am sick of his fan boys.
Thanks, Chris
/ read some nietzsche
// bets my skillz come from satan
>end christian rant>
If you have any sort of training or education in how to construct a logical argument and this is your idea of a "logical argument" then you are a moron.
Yes beacuse you know everything about my life and personality because of my stance on religion?! How insightful.
I never said I know everything about your life and personality because of your stance on religion. Why do you throw in everything about your life? Since you know so much about logical fallacies, you clearly know this a red herring. In your case I would call it the drama queen fallacy.
Actually if Micha was educated enough to understand the most basic concepts of logic he would know that attacking a person and calling them an asshole, telling them to go fuck themself, etc is considered an ad hominem argument which is not logically vaild. (feel free to double check me on that one, not that you actually will)Not being able to form a basic logical argument (premis supported by facts) is about as uneducated as one can be, so no I dont equate religion with lack of education, but I do equate weak fallacious arguments with lack of education.
You continually mention ad hominem attacks. Of course if you knew what the fuck you were talking about you would realize that an Ad Hominem attack can only exist during the course of a debate. Since there was no debate he was just letting you know that you are an asshole.
Actually I never attacked Louis personally.
Yes you did. You tell a man who is clearly a Christian that if there is a God to tell him that you think he is an asshole. You are insulting the man's beliefs. If you cannot understand that this is an attack maybe you should lay off the chronic for a bit.
Did I find the story silly and absurd?
So you are that dickhead in the mall telling all the kids that have just seen Santa that he is not real. You are that same guy that has to be heard on every topic like your opinion means something to the rest of us when in fact we all see how stupid you are the more you open your mouth.
Please point out anywhere in my statements in which I called anyone names (unless I was labled by someone else first, Micha, Oberfoosin1). I attacked the beliefs that made up the story but that was it. There is a big difference between attacking a belief and attacking a person (remember that ad hominem thingy?)!
You do not have to call someone names to have an Ad Hominem attack. You need to look up a definition of Ad hominem. If you were attempting to debate with Louis then your whole post was an Ad Hominem attack.
Had Micha attacked my beliefs without actually attacking me I would have had nothing to take issue with, unfortunately this was not the case.
Really? That would be an Ad Hominem attack. Go back to school fool.
Actually if you had the most basic idea of how to present an argument you would realize how idiodic that statement was.
Where did you present an argument? Show me! You presented nothing but a childish rant.
I work for the Public Defenders Office (I argue just a little bit) so until you work you way through years of undergraduate and post graduate logic classes I would appreciate if you would not discuss that which you cannot begin to understand!!!
Ooooo the Public Defender's Office! There are Public Defender's Offices all across this country filled with illiterate morons like you. Shit you cannot construct a sentence and you want to talk about logical fallacies?!?! You keep throwing the term Ad Hominem around like it is some sort special knowledge reserved for the well educated. It is a basic concept that you clearly, based on your moronic posts, have not quite completely grasped.
Apparently I incited many people but I also had many who agreed with my position, at least on EZboard.
Appeal to Popularity...look it up.
This is possibly the dumbest thing I have ever read, We may now be stupider for having read it.
I doubt it in your case, but since it is the dumbest thing you have ever read I have to assume you do not read your own posts. Oh by the way your last statement...Appeal to Ridicule...look it up.
Your post is clearly a knee jerk reaction to my post because if you actually spent the time to understand what has been said you would not have made it. If you actually thought about it and still wrote what you did than you are much more uneducated than I initially assumed.
Let me guess...you will quickly respond to my post with more nonsense and no clue as to how to express yourself with anything bordering on intelligence.
Wow, more logical fallacies! I’ll let you figure these out for yourself. Post if you need some help.
Chris,
You are in waaay over head. Perhaps you went over how to construct a logical argument in an English 101 at the local community college and you were able to remember the term Ad Hominem. You remembered enough to know that calling someone names in the course of a debate qualified as that Ad Hominem thingy. Of course you forgot the "in the course of a debate" part. You figured you would pull all that education out here and try to look smart. You have only succeeded in making yourself look like an idiot. A word of advice...quit while you are waaaaaay behind. You are waaaaay out of your league.
Another piece of advice…you should apologize to Louis and Micah. I suspect you are to immature to do so.
Class dismissed.
